Categories: Knowledge Center

Improving Heat Exchanger Models With Additive Manufacturing

Previously published on fastradius.com on July 8, 2019

Advances in additive manufacturing are suddenly making new part designs possible that we’ve always taken for granted had to be done a certain way. Take the heat exchanger, a common industrial component in machines of all types that’s been around since the industrial revolution.

The essential function of a heat exchanger is to move heat from one place to another, usually by fluid flow (gases or liquids) through a piece of machinery. They’re used in almost every industrial application, residence and anywhere that hot and cold matters: refrigerators, furnaces, AC systems, transport, oil refineries, commercial environments, hospitals and more.

The challenge of making heat exchangers more efficient has long plagued industrial engineers. A typical heat exchanger is made with metal and has a rectangular architecture composed of right angles, straight lines and stacks. These are the types of shapes most easily manufactured using traditional techniques, but they aren’t the best shapes for maximizing heat exchange in a small space.

It turns out there’s a way to make heat exchangers more efficient, lighter and less expensive — and more effective than ever before — using additive manufacturing.

What Have the Limitations of Traditional Heat Exchangers Been?

Most people are familiar with what a car radiator looks like: a bank of tubes with a large number of thin metal fins. It’s a large, blocky shape, basically a rectangle. Most engineers will acknowledge that new geometries of heat exchangers would improve performance, but it’s never been possible to achieve them until now.

In most designs, the components of the heat exchanger have relatively simple geometries. Fluid passages are usually straight and smooth. These straight, smooth passages normally have lower heat transfer compared to passages that are twisty and contoured. But unfortunately, twisty and contoured passages cannot be made using traditional manufacturing technologies.

In some of these rectangular designs, a manifold might direct the flow of fluid in the machine, causing it to flow into regions of high temperature or low temperature — the regions that are targeted for heat flow. Typically, these manifolds are made as individual, separate components. When components are made separately and then assembled, there is extra cost and labor associated with assembly and quality checks.

Pictures of fabricated manifold devices. (a) Overall shape of the manifold device. Front views of manifold devices (b) without static mixers and (c) with mixers. (d) Side-view schematic of static mixers with integrated manifold devices.

What’s Possible for Heat Exchangers Using Additive Manufacturing?

With additive manufacturing, you can exploit the available “white space” by making heat exchangers in a range of shapes that have an advantage in terms of energy efficiency, system performance and the ability to move larger amounts of heat around using smaller volumes of fluid.

In the study, we picked a common heat-exchanger architecture — a horizontal heated plate with a very simple geometry that water flows over to remove heat. It’s one of the simplest configurations for a heat exchanger. Using additive manufacturing, we created the manifold, the part that controls fluid flow, from additively manufactured polymer. We tested our designs using various technologies and materials. One particularly successful design was made using Carbon Digital Light Synthesis and Cyanate Ester, because that material is so highly heat-resistant. The resulting heat exchanger uses mixing structures that cause a cold fluid to efficiently remove heat from a hot plate.

Rectangular twisted tape mixer made using Carbon Digital Light Synthesis and Cyanate Ester

Polymer has a much lower thermal conductivity than metal, so you wouldn’t use polymer for the component that needs to carry heat. But with additive manufacturing, you can fabricate the mixers directly into the flow channels and then assemble them onto the heated plate. We analyzed two types of mixing structures: twisted tape structures like conventional static mixers and a novel, chevron-shaped offset wing structure.

Images of fabricated devices; (a) rectangular channel with no static mixers (plain channel); (b) rectangular channel twisted tape mixers; and (c) rectangular channel with chevron mixers.

What Did You Conclude?

We were able to successfully demonstrate significant improvements in heat exchanger performance, increasing the energy efficiency of products and tools created using additively manufactured designs. Overall, we saw about a 2x improvement of heat-transfer performance in the presence of the mixing structures produced with additive manufacturing. This is a big deal in a system where your goal is to remove as much heat as possible. It’s twice the heat.

In another type of industrial situation, where your goal might be to maximize the heat exchange while minimizing the size of the device — for instance, when designing a performance automobile where the size and weight of the vehicle impacts performance — you could shrink the size of the heat exchanger down to achieve the desired result. Additive manufacturing makes this sort of customization very flexible for application-specific goals.

Taking advantage of these new geometries is going to enable major advances in the manufacture of all types of machinery and appliances. Our research will help put these results in the hands of engineers around the world, who can exploit new techniques that allow for increased heat transfer. It’s very exciting.

SyBridge Technologies

Recent Posts

How SyBridge Expertise Optimizes Your Process and Lowers Costs

How SyBridge Expertise Optimizes Your Process and Lowers Costs In the fast-paced world of manufacturing,…

5 days ago

2024 Trends in Cosmetic Packaging

Imagine a world where your product stands out on crowded shelves, not just visually, but…

1 month ago

7‌ ‌Common‌ ‌Injection‌ ‌Molding‌ ‌Defects‌ ‌and‌ ‌How‌ ‌to‌ ‌Avoid‌ ‌Them‌

Injection molding is an efficient production method when high volumes of identical parts are needed. However,…

3 months ago

Critical Design Guidelines for Urethane Casting

As a production method, urethane casting sits in stark contrast to the hard tooling of injection molding. Whereas injection…

3 months ago

The Ultimate CNC Design for Manufacturability (DFM) Checklist

CNC machining is among the most popular manufacturing methods because the process is highly versatile, repeatable,…

4 months ago

HP Multi Jet Fusion Design Guidelines

Originally published on fastradius.com on October 20, 2021 Multi Jet Fusion enables the efficient production…

5 months ago